Effect of Comprehensive Recovery Program on Patients’ Outcomes Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Main Article Content
Keywords
CABG Surgery; Comprehensive Recovery Program; Outcomes.
Abstract
The present study evaluates the effect of comprehensive recovery program on patients’ outcomes post CABG surgery. The implementation of comprehensive recovery program will affect positively on patients’ outcomes post CABG surgery. This quasi-experimental research was conducted on a sample included a retrospective sample of 30 adult patients who had underwent CABG surgery during the past 6 months (control group) and a purposive sample of 30 adult patients who will undergo CABG surgery (study group). The study was affiliated at Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit (CTICU), Al-Nas hospital, Cairo, Egypt. Data were gathered via patients’ assessment interview questionnaire, European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EURO score II), patients’ outcomes assessment questionnaire and 36-Item Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) to assess patients’ postoperative outcomes. Present study revealed that there was a statistically insignificant difference between study and control group regarding demographic characteristics and medical history data. Meanwhile; there was a significant difference between the study and control group regarding postoperative increased mechanical ventilation time, chest infection, delay of inotropes discontinue, increased length of ICU stay and pain. Also there was a significant difference between the study and control group regarding general health, energy and fatigue, role limitation due to physical health and emotional health and total SF questionnaire score. Implementation of comprehensive recovery program affected positively on patients’ outcomes post CABG surgery which supported the research hypothesis. Enhance patients’ undergoing CABG surgery awareness regarding the comprehensive recovery program.
Downloads
References
2. Basch E. and Snyder C. (2017): Overcoming Barriers to Integrating Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Practice and Electronic Health Records. Annals of Oncology; Vol 28, No 10: pp 2332–2333. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx506.
3. Bishawi M., Hattler B., Almassi G., Spertus J., Quin J., Collins J., Grover F. and Shroyer A. (2018): Preoperative Factors Associated with Worsening in Health-Related Quality of Life Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Trial. American Heart Journal; Vol 198; pp 33–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.12.014.
4. Brazier J., Harper R., Jones N., O'Cathain A., Thomas K., Usherwood T. and Westlake L. (1992): Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ Vol 305, No. 6846: pp. 160-64. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160.
5. Chen L., Zheng J., Kong D. and Yang L. (2020): Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol on Patients Who Underwent Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft. Asian Nursing Research; Vol 14, No 1: pp 44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.01.004.
6. Düzyol İ., Saraçoğlu K., Şaşkın H., Yurt E., Yılmaz M., Düzyol C. and Saraçoğlu A. (2023): Enhanced Recovery in Cardiac Surgical Patients with Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Controlled before-and-after Study. Journal of The Cardiovascular Thoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Society; Vol 19, No 1: pp 15-22. doi: 10.14744/GKDAD.2023.78055
7. Engelman D., Ben-Ali W., Williams J., Perrault L., Reddy V. and Arora R. (2019): Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Society Recommendations. JAMA Surgery; Vol 154, No 8: pp 755–66. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1153.
8. Joshi G. (2018): Anesthetic Management for Enhanced Recovery After Major Surgery (ERAS) in Adults. UpToDate. Retrived at: http//: www.uptodate.com . Accessed on: 23-10-2020
9. Li M., Zhanga J., Ganb T., Qina Q., Wanga L., Zhua M., Zhanga Z., Pana Y., Yea Z., Zhanga F., Chenc X., Linc L., Huangc L., Luoc W., Guoa Q. and Wanga E. (2018): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery; Vol 54, No 3: pp 491–497. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy100.
10. Lima C. , Richtrmoc M., Leite W., Silva D., Lima W., Campos S. and De andrade A. (2019): Impact of Fast-Track Management on Adult Cardiac Surgery: Clinical and Hospital Outcomes. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva: Vol 31, No 3: pp 361-367. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20190059
11. Ljungqvist O., Scott M. and Fearon K. (2017): Enhanced Recovery after Surgery: A Review. JAMA Surgery; Vol 152, No 3: pp 292–298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952.
12. MacLeod J., D’Souza K., Aguiar C., Brown C., Pozeg Z., White C., Arora R., Legare J. and Hassan A. (2022): Fast Tracking in Cardiac Surgery: Is It Safe?. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery; Vol 17: No 69: 5-8. doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01815-9.
13. Moreira J. and Grilo E. (2019): Quality of Life after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery-Results of Cardiac Rehabilitation Programme. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation; Vol 15, No 5: pp 715-722. doi: 10.12965/jer.1938444.222.
14. Nashef S., Roques F., Sharples D., Nilsson J., Smith C., Goldstone A. and Lockowandt U. (2012): EURO Score II. European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery; Vol 41, No 4: pp 734-44;. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs043.
15. Paˇcari´c S., Turk T., Eri´c I., Orki´c Z., Eri´c A., Milosti´c-Srb A., Farˇci´c N., Bara´c I. and Nemˇci´c A. (2020): Assessment of the Quality of Life in Patients before and after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG): A Prospective Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health; Vol 17, No 4: pp1417. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041417.
16. Salenger R., Morton-Bailey V., Grant M., Gregory A., Williams J. and Engelman D. (2020): Cardiac Enhanced Recovery after Surgery: A Guide to Team Building and Successful Implementation. Seminars in Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery; Vol 32, No. 2: pp. 187-196. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.02.029.
17. Taylor R., Long L. and Mordi I. (2019): Exercise-Based Rehabilitation for Heart Failure. Cochrane Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis. JACC Heart Failure; Vol 7, No 8: pp 691-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.04.023.
18. Yiğit H., Demir Z., Balc E. and Mavioğlu L. (2023): Non-Interventional Feasibility Assessment for Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia. Cureus; Vol 15, No 1: e34392. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34392.
19. Zakhary W., Lindner J., Sgouropoulou S., Eibel S., Probst S., Scholz M. and Ender J. (2015): Independent Risk Factors for Fast-Track Failure Using a Predefined Fast-Track Protocol in Preselected Cardiac Surgery Patients. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Vol 29, No 6: pp 1461–1465. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.05.193.
20. Zurik S., Kurowicki A., Borys M., Iwasieczko A., Woloszczuk-Gebicka B., Czuczwar M. and Widenka K. (2020): Early Removal of Chest Drains in Patients Following Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (OPCAB) Is Not Inferior to Standard Care – Study in the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Group. Polish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery; Vol 18, No 2: pp71-74. doi: 10.5114/ms.2021.107466.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Transfer of Copyright and Permission to Reproduce Parts of Published Papers.
Authors retain the copyright for their published work. No formal permission will be required to reproduce parts (tables or illustrations) of published papers, provided the source is quoted appropriately and reproduction has no commercial intent. Reproductions with commercial intent will require written permission and payment of royalties.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.